a new old town III

Updated aerial perspective of the Block 8L mixed-use development, the proposed green roof has been consolidated to the eastern wing to allow for a better rooftop deck experience (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

Earlier this month, Ankrom Moisan pushed ahead with a third iteration of their proposed Block 8L development in front of the Historic Landmarks Commission. With a continued push to make the proposal ‘fit in’ to the existing fabric, the Commission was generally pleased with the results, with a few caveats regarding signage and other minor details. The new version is far from innovative or even contemporary in architectural design terms, a definite blow to those wanting to uphold the legitimacy of the existing historic district. Instead, an uncontentious faux-historic building will glide through design review and forever muddle-down the real things next door. Apparently, the whole notion of preservation reads locally as ‘mimicry’ instead of respect, further suppressing Portland’s aspirations of being a world class design city.

Third iteration rendering of the proposed Block 8L development from the NE, many of the previously proposed ground floor awnings have been removed from the project (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

Night rendering of the proposed Block 8L development highlighting the illuminated cast iron ‘grove’ along Naito (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

The overall design has not changed much from the second iteration, previous designs here and here, but the detailing has indeed evolved for the better, regardless of the retro look. All stucco and Hardi materials have been removed from the ground floor experience, and black metal panels and Doug Fir soffits have taken their place. The storefronts and upper windows will now be a uniform fiberglass system that has more texture and depth than previously proposed. The ground floor awnings that were at every window bay have also been removed, which cleans up the elevations and allows more light at the sidewalk level. Unfortunately, the Landmarks Commission wants the reintroduction of the awnings despite this.

Proposed cast iron ‘grove’ at the NE corner of the building, the exact pieces to be used in the collection have yet to be determined  (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

Southeast perspective along Naito, the ground floor facade has been redesigned to have a more dynamic layered effect with contrasting and recessed materials (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

One of the most notable aspects of the newest proposal is the way the design team has focused in on the facade treatment. The newest version is more layered than its predecessors, with a hierarchy of recessed planes each with its own materiality. Dark ‘ebony’ brick pilasters are set back between lighter ‘aspen’ colored ones, and heavy-duty folded metal jams are set back from the brick with even further recessed windows sunken behind them.

Northeast perspective across Davis Street, dark metal paneling and Doug Fir soffits have replaced the previously proposed stucco and white metal entryways (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

Proposed entry gate for the alley between Block 8L and the existing OCOM building, the specific metalwork for the gate will be designed by an artist through a separate review (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

There are only a few minor changes proposed for the alleyway. The Couch Street entrance will have two operable gates, one larger than the other to allow for a truck loading spot within the alley. The gates themselves will be designed at a later date when an artist is chosen to construct them. The only other change is the consolidation of the numerous thin stormwater planters into a pair of larger facilities to allow for a better pedestrian-oriented alleyway experience. As far as nighttime lighting, the alley will have a mix of catenary pendant and cafe-style globe lights strung from side-to-side with added light coming from street furniture underlights, soffit-mounted wall washers, and illuminated stairwell landings.

Southeast perspective across Naito (Ankrom Moisan & Gerding Edlen)

In the end, the building will get built, and its legacy will be that of a basic fabric building. I am pleased that something will be built on this parcel, one that has laid dormant for far too long. The neighboring full-block parking garage and functionally-obsolete Steel Bridge on-ramp have created a rather desolate pedestrian condition here, one that harbors unwelcoming activity and masks all sense of place. Perhaps my disapproval of this development’s design style is a bit overly critical, but, despite its flaws, I much preferred the original design direction Ankrom Moisan was taking before the Landmarks Commission dumbed it down.

Advertisements

5 responses to “a new old town III

  1. While I welcome this building overall, I’m increasingly coming to believe that the Historic Landmarks Commission is having a detrimental effect on our built environment, by stifling contemporary design while approving buildings that give a false sense of historical development. Old Town hasn’t seen a lot of new development, but the Alphabet District has, and almost every new building there is some kind of ersatz re-imagining of the past. The Historic Landmarks Commission will will approve things like the ghastly Williams Sonoma on NW 23rd, but it’s hard to imagine to 2281 Glisan by Allied Works being approved today. (It was completed in 2000, the same year that the Alphabet Historic District was created). The currently proposed Restoration Hardware on NW 23rd and the Youth Hostel on NW 18th are just starting the design advice process, and both look like they’re designed with a single intent: to make it palatable to the Historic Landmarks Commission.

    In the recent City Council hearing about 1727 NW Hoyt Nick Fish (I think) asked whether the Historic Landmarks Commission is the correct body to be performing Design Review for new buildings. I have to think that they’re not.

  2. “I much preferred the original design direction Ankrom Moisan was taking before the Landmarks Commission dumbed it down.”
    I am sure even the Designer would agree with that statement.

  3. Pingback: Weekly Roundup: Multnomah County Courthouse, Revolution Hall and more - Next Portland·

  4. Pingback: respecting history | places over time·

  5. Pingback: landmarks | places over time·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s